I know that erosion in the Lakes is a realy difficult issue and, yes, I do contribute to it!
But is it just me worried about the approach of "Fix the Fells"? I am getting the impression that quite a lot of its repair work is on paths where it is not really necessary, where erosion was not that bad and, indeed, it sometimes appears to be more to make the path "easier" rather than for any decent reason. Further some of its work, especially that which makes the dreadful stone stair cases on everything from Loughrigg to the Langdales and Helvellyn, are dire - often pitched with rock sloping slightly down slope, and done so badly they make the path far more dangerous, especially in wet or ice, than the original loose rock they are replacing. So how does this orgnaisation decide which paths to "fix", how can it be influenced, who is it accountable to and so on? Is it just me who is starting to resent its work so much and feels that, perhaps with some of the larger grants it now receives eg from the Lottery, that it might have too much cash and so is not being discerning enough in its prioritisation?